FISHERIES ENFORCEMENT Financial Administrative Penalties
Marine lawyer, Alistair Tawse, answers some questions about the financial penalties which can be issued by fishery authorities:
The MMO and the IFCAs essentially share a similar enforcement strategy, which is based around a Financial Administrative Penalty (‘FAP’) system.
This article answers some questions about that system and gives a brief overview of how it operates in practice.
The information below applies to England but very similar procedures are in place for N Ireland, Wales and Scotland.
What is the purpose of the FAP system?
The FAP system is designed to provide marine authorities with a ‘fast-track’ method of enforcement. It does this by empowering the authorities to issue financial penalties for a wide range of offences. A financial penalty, if accepted, avoids the time and expense of the authority pursuing each matter through a criminal prosecution.
Any marine enforcement officer (‘MEO’) (any officer appointed by the MMO or an IFCA) has the power to issue a FAP notice.
Who can be issued with a penalty notice?
Skippers, owners, representatives, and operators can all be issued with a FAP notice, but usually there is only one FAP to pay. For example, if the owner and a skipper of a vessel each receive a FAP notice of £1,000, and the owner pays his FAP, this will normally count as payment on behalf of the skipper. To make sure, the notice should be checked carefully.
How long between incident and decision?
The MMO’s compliance strategy states that a decision will be made within 6 weeks of finalising the investigation. However, it can take time to investigate an offence. For a summary-only offence (one which must be brought in the Magistrates’ Court), a charge should generally be laid within 6 months of the date of the offence. But many offences are ‘either-way’ or indictable offences, and these do not have a time limit. It is not unusual for an authority to start criminal proceedings more than a year after the alleged offence.
During the investigation, the MMO are likely to ‘freeze’ any relevant fishing licences (which does not affect fishing operations but will prevent an owner transferring the licence/vessel). The licence will remain frozen until payment of the FAP or conclusion of the case.
Does the person have to accept the penalty notice?
No, there is no obligation to accept or pay the FAP. The person has the option to ask for the matter to be heard at a criminal court. There is no further offence for not paying the FAP.
If the person accepts the FAP, it needs to be paid within 28 days from the date the notice was issued. (Note, a penalty notice is ‘issued’ when it is sent in the post or delivered by hand.) Payment cannot be made in cash. Payment of the FAP will discharge the person’s liability to be prosecuted.
Must MEOs issue a penalty notice in every case?
No, the authorities have a discretion as to whether to offer a FAP or refer the matter for prosecution. If it is a first offence, the MEO will probably offer a FAP but not if the offence is so serious that the MEO considers it warrants a higher penalty than the FAP system allows. For a repeat offender, the MEO is more likely to send the matter to court.
Also, there are some offences which are not eligible for FAPs. These include failing to comply with the directions or requirements made by an MEO, and/or intentionally obstructing an MEO in the performance of the officer’s functions. Offences which attract automatic licence suspension are not eligible under the FAP system. For these offences, criminal proceedings will follow.
How much are the financial penalties?
A tariff sets out the FAP levels for a range of offences which, for a first offence (the FAPs double for a second offence), can be summarised as follows:
Level 1: £250 – labelling or marketing offences;
Level 2: £500 – failure to use marker buoys; undersize fish (IFCA);
Level 3: £1,000 – fishing in restricted areas; gear offences; catch offences; log book offences;
Level 4: £2,000 – illegal fishing in designated areas; use of false documents;
Level 5: £5,000 – illegal fishing by non-UK vessels.
However, where the MEO identifies a financial gain from the offence, the FAP can be increased until the penalty is greater than the financial gain. Where more than one offence has been committed, multiple penalties can be issued. The maximum amount which can be issued under the FAP is £10,000.
Is it better to go to court?
Probably not. The statutory cap on the maximum fine for summary convictions (£5,000) was removed in 2015. Now, if a person chooses to go to court, and is found guilty, there is no limit on the fine they could face.
An analysis of the sentencing guidelines is outside the scope of this article but it can often be difficult to predict the level of fine which a Magistrates’ Court will decide upon. An important factor to bear in mind is the cost of criminal proceedings. Aside from his/her own costs, the person who is found guilty is likely to be ordered to pay the prosecuting authority’s costs, which can typically be anywhere between £1,000 – £5,000, or more. Significantly, payment of a FAP will avoid any points on a fishing licence (and a criminal record), which might otherwise occur if a person is convicted at court.
All of these factors mean that, for a person who admits the offence, it is likely to be a better option to accept the FAP, if offered, rather than choose to go to court.
It is prudent to speak with a solicitor, as soon as possible after being notified of an investigation and/or receiving a penalty notice, to obtain advice as to whether the penalty is appropriate and/or the likely outcome if the penalty is not accepted.
For more information about anything mentioned above please contact Alistair Tawse.
